Learned counsel for the Plaintiff further submits that as per item No. (ii) quoted above, at the ad-interim stage, Defendant No.1 was restrained from creating any third party rights in respect of the 78 car parking areas set out in prayer clause (e) of the Notice of Motion, but now, as and by way of an interim order, Defendant No.1 may be directed to handover 78 car parking areas to the Plaintiffs. It is submitted by the learned counsel that omission to hand over these car parking spaces has resulted in a serious inconvenience to the members of the Plaintiff society. As far as item No.(v) is concerned, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the Plaintiff that the arrears of maintenance charges referred to therein, pertained to the period up to 25 January 2013. It is submitted that these arrears have since been paid by Defendant No.1. Further maintenance charges for a few months after the date of the order, have also been paid by Defendant No.1 to the Plaintiff. It is submitted that the Plaintiff has, however, since April 2014 stopped paying the maintenance charges and such charges have been in arrears. It is submitted that prospective maintenance charges will have also to be paid by Defendant No.1. As far as the last item, namely, item No. (vi) is concerned, it is submitted that in spite of the statement made before this Court, the particulars sought in prayers (c) and (d) of the Notice of Motion have not been furnished by filing any affidavit.
