Defendants failed to appear in Notices of Motion without explanation. The court dismissed the matters for want of prosecution after granting a last chance.
Notices of Motion No. 1063 of 2010 and No. 1064 of 2010 dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
nms 1063-2014 & 1064-2014.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1063 OF 2010 IN
SUIT NO. 2547 OF 2007
M/s.Tetambe Developers Pvt.Ltd. …Plaintiff
vs.
Sushil Mohanlal Krishanani & Ors. ...Defendants
with
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1064 OF 2010
IN
SUIT NO. 2575 OF 2007
M/s.Jay Bhavin Trading Co.Pvt.Ltd. …Plaintiff vs. Sushil Mohanlal Krishanani & Ors. ...Defendants
Ms.Usha Singh i/b. M/s.Vyas & Bhalwal for Plaintiff. None for Defendants.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
11 AUGUST 2014
P.C. :
These Motions are taken out by Defendant Nos.5 to 7. On the last occasion, i.e. on 6 August 2014, when the matter was called, none appeared for the Defendants. As a last chance, the matter was adjourned to today's date. It was clarified that no adjournment would be granted on the next date.
Today also when the matter is called out, none appears for the Defendants / Applicants.
The Notices of Motion are dismissed for want of prosecution.
M/s.Tetambe Developers Pvt.Ltd.
Sushil Mohanlal Krishanani
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
