The Bombay High Court disposed of the suit barred by dismissal for want of prosecution due to non-appearance of the plaintiff on record.
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance by plaintiff.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s1241-09.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
SUIT NO.1241 OF 2009
Sports And Leisure Apparel Ltd. vs
...Plaintiff
Bansi Mall Management Co. Pvt. Ltd. And 5 Ors. ...Defendants.
None for the Plaintiff.
Mr. Harish Khedkar, i/b. Naik, Naik & Co., for the Defendants.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED : AUGUST 8, 2014
P.C. :
. The Suit was placed on board before Prothonotary and Senior Master on 4 July 2011, 5 August 2011 and 22 September 2011, when none appeared for the Plaintiff. The suit was then placed before this Court on 1 August 2014, when none appeared for the Plaintiff. The suit was, accordingly, directed to be placed today for dismissal. Even today, none appears for the Plaintiff. Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution.
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 1 of 1
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
