The High Court at Nagpur disposed of a civil application for condonation of delay of nineteen days in filing an appeal, allowing it with the condition to pay costs.
Condonation of delay of nineteen days in filing the appeal; restoration of appeal to file subject to payment of costs of Rupees Two Hundred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CAO757-14
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
C.A.O. NO.757/2014 IN MCA ST. NO.8844/2014 IN F.A. NO.1020/2013
(RITA UPENDRA PATIL VERSUS UPENDRA VITHALRAO PATIL)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri S.S. Meshram, counsel for the applicant.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V.K. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : JULY 21, 2014.
By this application, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of nineteen days in filing the appeal.
None appears for the non-applicant, though served. The statements of facts made in the civil application remain uncontroverted.
For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The civil application is allowed and disposed of.
M.C.A. ST. NO.8844/2014 .
Heard. Perused the contents of the application.
For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer made in the application is granted and the appeal is restored to file subject to payment of costs of Rupees Two Hundred in the High Court Bar Library within a period of two weeks.
The miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
APTE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay of nineteen days in filing the appeal is justified.
Rita Upendra Patil
Upendra Vithalrao Patil
Vasanti A. Naik
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
