Allowed and disposed of two applications. Condoned delay in restoration of a writ petition and restored it to file conditionally on payment of costs.
Writ petition restored to file subject to payment of costs of rupees five hundred in the High Court Bar Library within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
cao434.1 4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLN. (O) NO.434 OF 2014 AND
MISC. CIVIL APPLN. ST.NO.5160 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5787 OF 2012 (D)
Dr.Dilip Yeshwantrao Chavan
-vs-
The State of Maharashtra and another
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Court's or Judge's Orders.
Mr.D.S.RAut, counsel for the applicant.
Ms Tajwar Khan, AGP for the respondent No.1.
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : 22.07.2014.
CIVIL APPLN. (O) NO.434 OF 2014
Heard.
None appears for the non-applicant No.2, though
served.
Perused the contents of the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the prayer made in the application is granted and the delay in filing the restoration application is condoned. Civil application is allowed and disposed of.
MISC. CIVIL APPLN. ST.NO.5160 OF 2014
Heard.
2/2
cao434.1 4
None appears for the non-applicant No.2, though
served.
Perused the contents of the application. For the reasons stated in the application, the writ petition is restored to file subject to payment of costs of rupees five hundred in the High Court Bar Library within a period of one week. Miscellaneous civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE
KHUNTE
Dr. Dilip Yeshwantrao Chavan
The State of Maharashtra
Vasanti A. Naik
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
