Appeal against dismissal of appointment claim due to lack of required diploma. Court held matter was time-barred after nine years post-termination and not fit for letters patent jurisdiction.
Letters Patent Appeal dismissed; appellant directed to apply afresh if vacancy arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
314.13-lpa.sxw
1/2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO. 314 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1025 OF 2011
Shri.Shivaji Damu Kale. ... Appellant. V/s. Chaundeswari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and others. ... Respondents.
A.M.Joshi for the appellant.
Avinash Patil i/b. A.B.Patil for the respondents.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATED : 5th September 2014.
P.C. :
Heard.
2/2 314.13-lpa.sxw
Appeal No.863/2007 ( State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Tryambak Chaudhari ) and Government Resolution dated 11th November 2011.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S..
Shri Shivaji Damu Kale
Chaundeswari Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and others
NARESH H. PATIL
B.P.COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
