The single-judge family court dismissed an appeal filed by an appellant wife, holding that it cannot be entertained based on prior findings in a connected judgment.
Appeal dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Pvr 1/2 fca21-09.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.21 OF 2009
Alka Sovind Chandewar ) Aged 45 years, Occupation Business, ) Hindu, Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai, ) Residing at: Flat No.601/701, ) Sarla Sadan, S.V.Road, ) Malad (West), Mumbai – 400 064. )...Appellant.
Vs.
Sovind Nathuji Chandewar ) Aged 51 years, Occ. Business, ) Hindu, Indian Inhabitant of Mumbai ) Residing at Gambers Residence, ) Gambers Estate, S.V. Road, Malad (West), Mumbai – 400 064 )...Respondent .....
Mr.H.R.Pawar, for the Appellant.
Mr.R.T.Lalwani, for the Respondent.
CORAM: A. S. OKA & G. S. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED: 5th SEPTEMBER,2014 ---
P.C. :-
Pvr 2/2 fca21-09.doc
appellant – wife cannot be entertained and is accordingly, dismissed with No
order as to costs.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)
Alka Sovind Chandewar
Sovind Nathuji Chandewar
A. S. Oka
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
