this Court as a piece of evidence. In the said affidavit, Z has clearly stated that X married to him in spite of having knowledge of his previous marriage. He has reiterated that as his marriage with X was a second marriage, she is not entitled to any maintenance. Thus, there is a categorical admission by Z about the performance of his marriage with X. Before we go to the documentary evidence on record, the admitted position between the parties is that from June, 1986 till the year 1995, they stayed together in the flat at Bandra. For a few months, they resided at Zambia. In the year 1990, X conceived on second occasion. In the light of this factual background, now we must make a reference to the documentary evidence on record. While we are dealing with the documentary evidence, we must also note the admitted fact that while admitting X in a hospital for delivery of Y, Z admittedly accepted that he was the husband of X. Now, we turn to the documentary evidence on record. There is a document at Exhibit 57 which is the passport of X dated 25th May, 1987 wherein Z is shown as her husband and the address of the flat in Band Stand Co-operative Housing Society, Bandra has been mentioned as her residential address. We must note that Exhibit 58 is the passport of X standing in her maiden name. The passport of Y is at Exhibit 59 which is dated 14th June, 1989 in which the name of Z appears as her father. Along with Exhibit 60, there are several bills of purchase of household and electrical goods at the address of the flat at Bandra which contains the name of Z as the husband of X. The said bills show that X has been described as the wife of Z. Exhibit 61 is the demand note issued by the Mahanagar Telephone Nigam in which name of X appears as wife of Z. The
