Application for direction under S. 391-394 Companies Act, 1956 for scheme of arrangement. Court dispensed with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to universal consents. Separate summons for the transferee company also dispensed with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO. 771 OF 2014
In the matter of the Companies Act, 1956;
And
In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956;
And
In the matter of Sitel Operating Corporation India Limited;
And
In the matter of the Scheme of Arrangement/Amalgamation between: Sitel Operating Corporation India Limited
And
Sitel India Limited
And
Their respective shareholders.
| Sitel Operating Corporation India Limited | ) |
|---|---|
| a company incorporated under the Companies | ) |
| Act, 1956 having its registered office at | ) |
| Boomerang,No.501,Wing A & B1,5th floor, | ) |
| Chandivali- Farm Road, Near Chandivali Studio, | ) |
| Andheri East, Mumbai- 400072 | )…Applicant Company |
Called for Direction
Mr. Munaf Virjee a/w Mr. Manhar Singh Saini i/b DSK Legal, Advocates for the Applicant.
Coram : S. J. Kathawalla J. Date : 10th October, 2014
MINUTES OF THE ORDER
Upon the Application of the abovenamed Applicant Company by a Company Summons for Direction AND UPON HEARING Mr. Munaf Virjee instructed by DSK Legal, Advocates for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated April 16, 2014 of Mr. Gautam Sinha, Authorised Signatory of the Applicant Company in support of the Company Summons for Direction and Exhibits therein referred to, IT IS ORDERED: -
Applicant Company, as mentioned in paragraph no. 20 of the Affidavit in Support of the Summons for Direction.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mahaamba Investment Limited versus IDI Limited (2001)105 CompCas page 16 to 18Explained¶23
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sitel Operating Corporation India Limited
S. J. Kathawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
