Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the Civil Revision Application; the court granted leave and dismissed the application as withdrawn without costs.
Leave granted to withdraw the Civil Revision Application as permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.A. No.
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.59 OF 2014
Pravin Kundlik Narwade VERSUS
..PETITIONER
Eshwarsing s/o Fakirsing Tatu ..RESPONDENT
Mr R.K. Khandelwal, Advocate for petitioner; Mr J.J. Patil, Advocate for respondent
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : 22nd July, 2014
PER COURT:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the present Civil Revision Application. Leave granted. Civil Revision Application is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
amj
Pravin Kundlik Narwade
Eshwarsing s/o Fakirsing Tatu
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
