The High Court held that the trial Court correctly entertained an application under Section 85 of the Wakf Act, 1995, to question the civil court's jurisdiction as a preliminary issue in a suit involving alleged lack of jurisdiction under the Wakf Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.A.No.101/2014
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.101 OF 2014
Usman Baig Hussain Baig and ors.
..Petitioners
Versus
Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin and anr.
..Respondents
Mr Shaikh Naseer, Advocate for petitioners
CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : 21st July 2014
PER COURT
C.R.A.No.101/2014
2
( N.W. SAMBRE, J.)
(vvr/101.14cra)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the trial Court erred in entertaining an application under Section 85 of the Wakf Act, 1995 regarding the tenability of suit (jurisdiction)
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Usman Baig Hussain Baig
Shaikh Nizam Shaikh Jainoddin
N.W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
