The court disposed of the Contempt Petition because an affidavit by the Respondents stated the salary bill had been deposited with the Petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(CP 595 of 2013)
vat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION No.595 OF 2013 IN
WRIT PETITION No. 3197 OF 2011
Mallikarjun Ramgondappa Patil ...Petitioner vs. Mr. Sanjay Patil The Principal Secretary, Higher & Technical Education Department and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Mihir Desai for Petitioner Mr.A.I. Patel -AGP for Respondent No.3 **********
CORAM : V. M. KANADE , & P.D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : AUGUST 27, 2014
P.C. :
An affidavit in reply has been filed by the Respondents, stating therein that the amount of salary bill has been deposited in the accounts of the Petitioner. Hence, in view of the averments made in the affidavit in reply filed by the Respondents, the Contempt Petition does not survive and is, accordingly, disposed of.
Vaishali Tikam
1/1
Mallikarjun Ramgondappa Patil
Mr. Sanjay Patil
V. M. KANADE
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
