Prakash Baburao Kamale v. Shri Tukaram Kasar, CEO and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
VPH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CP. 568-13
VPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION No. 568 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION No. 7796 OF 2012
Prakash B. Kamale ... Petitioner Vs. Tukaram Kasar & Anr. ... Respondents ***
None for the Petitioner. None for Respondent.
CORAM : V. M. KANADE, & P. D. KODE, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2014
PC.
. An application is made for “Speaking to the Minutes” of the order dated 4.9.2014. It is submitted that contempt petition was disposed. However, inadvertently in the last sentence of the said order, the word “Writ” is typed. The word “Writ” appearing in the last sentence of the said order is substituted by the word “Contempt”. Order is accordingly modified.
Vinayak Halemath
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakash B. Kamale
- respondent
Tukaram Kasar
Coram
V. M. KANADE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court