The court acknowledged compliance with its directions by the Government. Consequently, the contemted petition was disposed of without further pursuit by the counsel for the petitioners.
The contempt petition was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
36CP444.13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 444 OF 2013 IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 282 OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1632 OF 2012
Bhau Daji Patil & Ors. .. Petitioners Versus Rajaram Mane & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. P. D. Dalvi for the petitioners Mr. A.E.I. Patel, AGP for respondent No. 4 – State.
CORAM:-V. M. KANADE & M. L. TAHALIYANI, JJ. DATED : - 03/09/2014
P.C.
We are informed that the directions given by this Court
have been complied by the Government and, therefore, the learned
counsel for the petitioners does not wish to pursue this petition any
further.
2 Hence contempt petition is disposed of.
(M.L. TAHALIYANI, J.) (V. M. KANADE, J.)
md.saleem
1/1
Bhau Daji Patil
Rajaram Mane
V. M. Kanade
M. L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
