The court discharged a contempt petition against an officer of the Social Welfare Department. The court found no willful or deliberate violation of its order, only a slight delay in compliance, holding that the petition did not survive.
The contempt petition is disposed of as it does not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44cp434-13.doc
spb/
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 434 OF 2013 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6378 OF 2012
Bhosale Anilkumar Vasantrao … Petitioner. V/s. Mr. R.D.Shinde, Secretary, Social Welfare Dept. Mantralaya & Others. … Respondents/Contemnor.
None for the Petitioner. Mr. Vishal Thadani, Govt. Pleader, for the State.
CORAM : V.M.KANADE AND M.L.TAHALIYANI,JJ.
DATE : 03 SEPTEMEBR, 2014
P.C. :
1 The learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 has filed affidavit in reply. It is stated in the reply that the order passed by this court has been complied with though there was a slight delay in complying the said order.
2 We are satisfied that there was no willful or deliberate violation or disobedience of the order passed by this court. Hence, the contempt petition does not survive and it is disposed of as such.
(M.L.TAHALIYANI,J.) (V.M.KANADE,J.)
1/1
Borey
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition survives given that there was a slight delay in complying with the order passed by this court.
Bhosale Anilkumar Vasantrao
Mr. R.D. Shinde
V.M. Kanade
M.L. Tahaliyani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
