Mrs. Usha Bipin Shah v. Xlo India Ltd. (CINU63000MH1958PLC011042)
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought to withdraw Company Petition No. 42 of 2014. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn on the request of the petitioner's advocate.
The petitioner sought to withdraw Company Petition No. 42 of 2014. The petition was allowed to be withdrawn on the request of the petitioner's advocate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
44-CP-42-2014.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 42 OF 2014
Mrs. Usha Bipin Shah…Petitioner
Versus
XLO India Ltd.…Respondents
…Respondents
Ms. Radha Ved i/b M/s. Sanjay Udeshi & Co. for the Petitioners
Mr. R.A. Sahikh, for the Respondents
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:15th April 2014
PC:-
At the request of learned advocate for the petitioner, petition
is allowed to be withdrawn.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
Mrs. Usha Bipin Shah
XLO India Ltd.
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court