The High Court of Bombay Appellate Side disposed of a contempt petition after finding that the petitioner had already received payment pursuant to previous directions of this Court, rendering the matter without consideration.
Contempt petition and pending civil application disposed of as payment already made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
26 CONT. PETITION NO. 280 OF 2013
IN WP/5979/2011
SHESHRAO BHIKAN NIKAM VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. G. S. Patil AGP for Respondents: Mr. S. G. Karlekar
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: April 07, 2014
PER COURT :
( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
dyb
Sheshrao Bhikan Nikam
The State of Maharashtra
R. M. Borde
A. M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
