Court granted leave to withdraw a contingent contempt petition under WP/792/2008. The court disposed of the petition as withdrawn along with any pending civil application.
Leave to withdraw petition granted; Petition and pending civil application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURNAGABAD
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s Orders.
2 CONT. PETITION NO. 161 OF 2014
IN WP/792/2008
BALIGUNNISA BEGUM MOHD SAMIUDDIN CHAUDHARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. M. S. Choudhary AGP for Respondents: Mr. K. M. Suryawanshi
CORAM : R. M. BORDE & A.M. BADAR, JJ. Dated: April 07, 2014
PER COURT :
( A.M. BADAR, J. ) ( R. M. BORDE, J. )
dyb
BALIGUNNISA BEGUM MOHD SAMIUDDIN CHAUDHARI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
R. M. BORDE
A.M. BADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
