Disposed

Smt. Manisha Sahebrao Gaikwad v. Dr. W. B. Tayade

Bombay HC16 Dec 2014CP/259/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court visited a contempt petition challenging delay in submitting an enquiry report and consequent disciplinary action against a former employee. The bench observed that disciplinary action had already been taken and the applicant tendered an unconditional apology, leading to the discharge of the notice.

What did the court decide?

Apology accepted; Contempt notice discharged; Contempt petition disposed of.

Smt. Manisha Sahebrao Gaikwad Vs Dr. W. B. Tayade — Contempt of Court | Bombay HC (2014)

cp259

ssp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.259 OF 2011 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8484 OF 2007

¶5

Manish Sahebrao Gaikwad
vs.

¶6

...Petitioner

¶7

The Director,
Medical Education and Research,
Government of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents

¶8

Mr.Ravi Kadam for the petitioner
Mr.S.N.Patil, AGP for the respondent No.1

¶9

CORAM : A.S.OKA, &
 A.S.GADKARI, JJ.
 DATE : DECEMBER 16,2014

¶10

P.C.:

¶11

1We have perused the affidavit of Shri
Chandrashekhar Gulabrao Patil, the Assistant
Professor of Statistics and Demography, Government
Medical College, Miraj, District Sangli.

¶12

2The learned counsel for the petitioner is
justified in his criticism that though a statement
was made before this Court on 30th April 2008 that a
report on the Departmental Enquiry will be submitted
within six months, in fact, the said report was
submitted in the year 2011.

¶13

3However, we find that on the basis of the
Enquiry Report, the State Government has taken the
disciplinary action and Dr.Nagesh Naik has been
removed from the employment.

¶14

¶15

cp259

¶16

4As Shri Chandrashekhar G. Patil has tendered
unconditional apology to the Court, considering the
action taken by the State Government, the apology
tendered deserves to be accepted. Accordingly, we
accept the apology. Contempt Notice is accordingly
discharged. Contempt petition is disposed of.

¶17

(A.S.GADKARI,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)

Smt. Manisha Sahebrao Gaikwad v. Dr. W. B. Tayade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Manisha Sahebrao Gaikwad v. Dr. W. B. Tayade

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Powar and Sons, through Prop. Shri. Rajesh Shankarrao Powar, Throough Poa, Shri. R. v. Powar Vs Ld. District Collector of Kolhapur and Ors.

Dattatraya Ramchandra Kadam and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Rural Dept and Ors.

Vitthal Krishna Pawar Vs Grampanchayat Uchgaon through Its Sarpanch and Ors.

Suresh Ganpati Dhonukshe Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Avh Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Environment and Anr.

Smt. Manisha Sahebrao Gaikwad Vs Dr. W. B. Tayade