Disposed

M/S.Mehta Vetcare v. R J Feeds Pvt.Ltd., Cin NO.U74999MH2007PTC174751

Bombay HC2 Apr 2014CP/235/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an order disposing of a company petition where the petitioner, having recovered principal dues, sought to withdraw the petition. The court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a proceeding for recovery of overdue interest.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn; liberty granted to file proceedings for recovery of overdue interest.

M/S.Mehta Vetcare Vs R J Feeds Pvt.Ltd., Cin… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

29-CP-235-2013.DOC

¶2

Vishal

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.235 OF 2013

¶4

M/s. Mehta Vetcare...Petitioner

¶5

Versus
R. J. Feeds Private Limited...Respondent

¶6

Ms. Vishakha Bhatia i/b.M/s.S.R.Rawell & Co. for the Petitioner.

¶7

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: APRIL 02, 2014.

¶8

PC:-

¶9

1.Learned advocate for the petitioner submits an additional
affidavit dated 10th February 2014. Exhibit 2 to that affidavit shows
that the Company has, on 2nd July 2013 i.e.after filing of this
petition in February 2013 paid to the petitioner the sum of Rs.
76,750/- which is the total amount of the petitioner’s principal
claim. The Remaining claim made by the petitioner of Rs. 6,152/- is
toward interest.

¶10

2.Learned advocate for the petitioner, therefore, seeks leave to
withdraw the petition with liberty to file and adopt a suitable
proceeding for the recovery of the remainder, i.e. overdue interest.

¶11

1 of 2

¶12

29-CP-235-2013.DOC

¶13

3. Leave granted with liberty as prayed.

¶14

4. Petition is disposed of in these terms.

¶15

(G. S. PATEL, J.)

¶16

2 of 2

M/S.Mehta Vetcare v. R J Feeds Pvt.Ltd., Cin NO.U74999MH2007PTC174751

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Mehta Vetcare v. R J Feeds Pvt.Ltd., Cin NO.U74999MH2007PTC174751

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Siddharth Das Vs High Mark Credit Information Services Pvt.Ltd., Cin NO.774130MH2005PTC216732

Tata Motors Ltd. Vs Sundeep Polymers (P) Ltd.

Indian Petrochemicals Corpn.Ltd. Vs the Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai and Anr.

The Indian Express Ltd. Vs M/S.Magna Publishing Co. Ltd.

Hindustan Sugars Ltd. and Anr. Vs Nandkishor Shankarrao Kamthe and 8 Ors.

M/S.Mona Pharmachem Vs R J Feeds Pvt.Ltd., Cin NO.U74999MH2007PTC174751