Judge heard multiple contempt petitions alleging Zilla Parishad failed to post petitioners as requested despite representations. Court found steps were taken but dismissed the contention of a prima facie case at this stage, disposing the petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contempt Petition No.17/2014 with other contempt petitions
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.17 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8980 OF 2012
Gopalrao s/o Dinkar Firke ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Deepak Choudhary & anr. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri G.K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
W I T H
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.18 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.2446 OF 2013
Vijay s/o Motiram Kalbhile ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Deepak Choudhary & anr. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri G.K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for
Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
W I T H
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.19 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3268 OF 2013
Contempt Petition No.17/2014 with other contempt petitions
2
Sarojini d/o Vikram Nikam ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Deepak Choudhary & anr. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri G.K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
W I T H
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.20 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3531 OF 2013
Bhalchandra s/o Hiraji Chaudhari ... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Deepak Choudhary & anr. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri G.K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
W I T H
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.21 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1905 OF 2013
Pralhad s/o Narhari Kale
... PETITIONER
VERSUS
Deepak Choudhary & anr. ... RESPONDENTS
Shri G.K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for
Contempt Petition No.17/2014 with other contempt petitions
3
Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
W I T H
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.22 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.778 OF 2013
VERSUS
Deepak Choudhary & anr.
... RESPONDENTS
Shri G.K. Kshirsagar, Advocate for petitioner Shri V.C. Patil, Advocate holding for Shri U.B. Bondar, Advocate for respondents No.1 & 2
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
DATED: 18th January, 2014.
PER COURT :
Contempt Petition No.17/2014 with other contempt petitions
4
of petitioners were to be given. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, the Zilla Parishad heard the petitioners and even it was decided in the meetings as to where these petitioners may be posted. However, the petitioners have not been accommodated as per the Government policy. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, instead, others have been accommodated where the petitioners could have been posted.
4. Contempt Petitions are disposed of.
(A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.)
fmp/cp17.14
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a prima facie case exists to initiate contempt proceedings against Zilla Parishad for alleged violation of representation that petitioners would be posted according to their convenience.
Whether the Zilla Parishad accommodation of other candidates instead of petitioners constitutes sufficient grounds for contempt proceedings.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gopalrao s/o Dinkar Firke
Sarojini d/o Vikram Nikam
Bhalchandra s/o Hiraji Chaudhari
Pralhad s/o Narhari Kale
Vijay s/o Motiram Kalbhile
Deepak Choudhary
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
