“ I have considered rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties. I have also perused the material on record. As noted earlier, the plaintiff filed the suit for declaration of his title as also that the sale deed executed by defendant No. 2, since deceased, in favour of defendant No. 1, is illegal and same is not binding on the plaintiff. During pendency of that suit, the plaintiff preferred application exhibit 6 and defendant No. 1 preferred application exhibit 21. After hearing both the sides, by order dated 6th February, 2004, the learned trial Judge dismissed the application exhibit 6 preferred by the plaintiff and allowed the application at exhibit 21 made by defendant No. 1. The learned trial Judge restrained the plaintiff from causing any kind of obstruction to the peaceful possession of defendant No. 1 over the suit property till the decision of the suit. It is not in dispute that the said injunction was operative during pendency of the suit and suit came to be decided on 25th October, 2012. Immediately thereafter, defendant No. 1 filed appeal on 18th January, 2013 and took out the application at exhibit 7 for stay of the decree passed by the learned trial Court. By the impugned order dated 2nd March, 2013, the learned District Judge-2,
