Petitioner sought withdrawal of a company petition. The issue was resolved by settlement. Leave to withdraw was granted subject to a mutual agreement regarding return of documents before payment.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition on the understanding that documents will be returned upon payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24-CP-200-12.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO. 200 OF 2012
Sunil Kumar Bose.…Petitioner
Versus
Oilco Services (India) Ltd.…Respondents
Mrs. Mohana Nair i/b M/s. JMB Partners for the Petitioner.
Mr. A. Daver i/b M/s DSK Lega for the Respondents.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: MARCH 5, 2014
PC:-
1.Learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the matter
has been settled. He seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
2.Mr. Daver, learned Advocate for the respondents states that
the payment will be made within four weeks from today. Mrs. Nair
says that if there are any documents and papers of the respondents
with the petitioner, they will be returned before the payment is
made. It is not possible to make the payment a condition precedent.
3.On this understanding, the petition is allowed to be
withdrawn.
1 of 2
24-CP-200-12.DOC
4. Liberty to the parties to apply.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
2 of 2
Sunil Kumar Bose
Oilco Services (India) Ltd.
G. S. Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court