The single judge dismissed a suit due to the plaintiff's non-appearance at the hearing despite an advocate having appeared for listing.
The suit is dismissed with damages to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-S-3484-96.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 3484 of 1996
Angela Marchon.
Versus
Khemchand Chanchlani.
…Plaintiff
…Defendant
None for the Plaintiff.
None for the Defendant.
CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J
DATED:MARCH 5, 2014
PC:-
1.Today, the matter is listed for directions. None appears for
the plaintiffs, although the appearance of the advocate is shown and
the name of the plaintiffs is called out.
2.The suit is dismissed under Order IX Rule 3 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908. Interim / ad-interim relief, if any, granted
earlier in any interlocutory proceedings in this suit, shall stand
vacated forthwith.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be dismissed due to non-appearance of the plaintiff.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Angela Marchon
Khemchand Chanchlani
G. S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court