Concourt disposed of a contempt petition after the respondent deposited arrears of maintenance. In the associated appeal, the appellant was permitted to withdraw a deposited sum of Rs. 65,000 towards maintenance arrears.
Contempt petition disposed of with no order as to costs; deposit permitted to be withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2807cp166.12
1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 166 OF 2012 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 565 OF 2008
Vaishali Rajesh Barde VERSUS Rajesh Harihar Barde
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ. DATE : JULY 28, 2014 .
Heard. Shri Dongre, the learned counsel for the respondent states that the entire arrears of maintenance have been deposited in this Court.
Shri Bhandarkar, the learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute this position.
In view of the aforesaid, the contempt petition is disposed of with no order as to costs.
FIRST APPEAL NO. 565 OF 2008:
Heard. It appears that the respondent has deposited a sum of Rs. 65,000/- in this Court towards arrears of maintenance. The appellant is permitted to withdraw the same. Order accordingly.
JUDGE
JUDGE
2807cp166.12
2
svk
Vaishali Rajesh Barde
Rajesh Harihar Barde
Vasanti A. Naik
V. K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
