The petition filed under the Companies Act was dismissed because it was withdrawn at the request of the counsel for the petitioners. Consequently, the connected company application was also dismissed as it could not survive the dismissal of the main petition.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected company application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-CP-135-14.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY PETITION NO.135 OF 2014
WITH
COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2014
M/s. Jay Ambe Developers.…Petitioners
Versus
M/s. Future Retail Ltd.…Respondents
Ms. Rita Yadav i/b Raval Shah & Co. for the Petitioners.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED: MARCH 5, 2014
PC:-
1. At the request of the learned Advocate for the petitioners, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In view of the dismissal of the company petition, company application does not survive and it is dismissed accordingly.
(G. S. PATEL, J.)
1 of 1
M/s. Jay Ambe Developers
M/s. Future Retail Ltd
G.S. PATEL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court