The High Court of Bombay at Mumbai dismissed Contempt Petition No. 11 of 2014, allowing the petitioners to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one upon obtaining consent from the Advocate General.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition after obtaining consent of the Advocate General.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cp 11-2014.doc
1/1
sat
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 11 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2658 OF 2012 IN SUIT NO. 92 OF 1982
Harikishan Vedprakash Agarwal & Anr. …Petitioners vs. Burjor Joshi & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.D.R. Jhuria for Plaintiffs in Suit 92/1982 and for Petitioners in Conp 11/2014.
Mr.Shishir Joshi with Mr.Vachan Bodke i/b. M/s.Chitnis Vaithy for Defendants 4 to 7.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
15 JULY 2014
P.C. :
Learned Counsel for the Plaintiffs seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition after obtaining consent of the learned Advocate General.
Contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(S.C. Gupte, J.)
Harikishan Vedprakash Agarwal & Anr.
Burjor Joshi & Ors.
S.C. GUPTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
