Order allowing chamber summons application to delete Dena Bank from the party array in Suit No.1255 of 2012. Court allowed deletion based on Plaintiff's non-objection.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ASN
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.902 OF 2013 IN
SUIT NO.1255 OF 2012
Dena Bank. ...Applicant. In the matter between Sushant Rajendra Acharya. ...Plaintiff.
vs.
Nandkishore Anandrao Acharya and ors. ...Defendants.
Mr. Nirmal. i/by AMT Legal for the Plaintiff. Mr. S.A.Inamdar i/by Madhav Jamdar for Defendant No.1. Ms. Ashwini Takalkar for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6. Mr.I. Merchant i/by K. V. Aiyar & Associates for Defendant No.2.
CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA, J. DATE : 13 JUNE 2014
PC:
This chamber summons has been taken out by defendant No.2 Dena Bank with a prayer that they may be deleted from the array of the parties. Mr. Nirmal appearing for the plaintiff states that the plaintiff has no objection for the deletion of defendant No.2 Dena Bank from the array of the parties. Accordingly, chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer (a) and defendant No.2 is deleted from the array of the parties.
Dena Bank.
M. S. SANKLECHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
