This short order grants the original applicant permission to voice record the respondent's evidence in an arbitration application, directing the Commissioner to allow the recording with costs borne by the applicant.
Directive to the Commissioner to allow voice recording of the respondent's evidence by the applicant at the applicant's cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
chs351-14.doc
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.351 OF 2O14 IN
ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.169 OF 2006
Nenshi Ganesh Mirani … Applicant In the matter between Nenshi Ganesh Mirani … Applicant Vs. Amrutlal Ganesh Mirani … Respondent .....
Mr. Vijay M. Vaghela, for the Applicant.
Mrs. Aakansha V. Thakkar, i/b. M/s. Purnanand & Co., for the Respondent.
CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.
DATED : SEPTEMBER 18, 2014
P.C. :
. This Chamber Summons is taken out by the original Applicant for direction to videograph recording of the evidence of the Respondent, which is presently being recorded under orders passed by this Court. Learned Counsel for the Applicant is ready to bear the cost of voice recording of the evidence.
Pg 1 of 2
chs351-14.doc
( S.C. GUPTE, J. )
Pg 2 of 2
Nenshi Ganesh Mirani
Amrutlal Ganesh Mirani
S.C. Gupte
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
