The application for a fixed date of hearing in a civil application challenging a writ petition is rejected; no substantive decision is rendered in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skn 1/1 509.14caw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 509 OF 2014 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 5675 OF 2010
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Anish Khandekar i/b. L.M.Acharya for the applicant.
Mrs.Pamnani for respondent No.1.
D.R.Shah for respondent No.3.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, JJ.
DATED : 13th June 2014.
P.C. :
For the present we do not find that the petition needs to be heard out of turn. The application for fixed date of hearing is rejected.
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.)
Sanjay Nanoskar, P.S.
Anish Khandekar
Respondent No.1
Respondent No.3
NARESH H. PATIL
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
