The High Court held that since the main writ petition (WP No. 151 of 2014) was disposed of, the connective civil application (CA No. 1891 of 2014) could not survive and was disposed of accordingly.
The civil application is disposed of as it could not survive the disposal of the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
skc
CA-1891-14
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1891 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 151 OF 2014
| D. K. Soonawalla | .. Applicant / Ori. Resp. No.3 |
|---|---|
| In the matter between : |
|
| F. F. Nargoliwalla & Anr. versus |
..Petitioners |
| The State of Maharashtra & Ors. | ..Respondents |
Mr. Darius K. Soonawalla – Applicant ( Ori. Resp. No. 3) present in person. Mr. V. A. Thorat – Senior Advocate with Mr. Bipin J. Joshi for Original Petitioners.
Ms Aparna D. Vhatkar – AGP for State – Respondents No. 1 and 2.
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 18 September 2014
P. C . :
In view of the disposal of the writ petition, civil application does not
survive and is disposed of accordingly.
(M. S. SONAK, J.)
Chandka
1/1
F. F. Nargoliwalla & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
D. K. Soonawalla
M. S. SONAK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
