The High Court disposed of a civil application seeking time to take instructions as it did not survive since the main writ petition was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sjs 12-CAW-1132.2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE – CIVIL
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1132 OF 2014
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.10411 OF 2009
Shripati Govind Gurav
& Others.... Applicants
Vs.
The Collector,
Kolhapur & Others.... Respondents
Mr. Hari Ram Vdayar i/b Mr. Chetan Patil
for the Applicants.
Mr. V.S. Gokhale, AGP, for Respondent
Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM: A.S. OKA &
A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATED: APRIL 25, 2014
P.C:
1.Learned counsel appearing for the
applicants seeks time to take instructions.
2.The civil application has been filed
on 17-1-2012. Perusal of the Farad sheet of the
main Writ Petition shows that on 26-11-2012,
the applicants have been permitted to withdraw
Page 1 of 2
sjs 12-CAW-1132.2014 the main petition. Hence this application does not survive and the same is accordingly disposed of. (A.A. SAYED, J.) (A.S. OKA, J.)
Shripati Govind Gurav & Others
The Collector, Kolhapur & Others
A.S. OKA
A.A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court