Allowed
Shri Siddha Sarana Sangh, Machnur and Ors. v. Suresh Sadashiv More and Others.
Bombay HCCAO/37/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cao-37.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2014 IN REVIEW PETITION STAMP NO.13661 OF 2006 IN LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.321 OF 2002
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s Court’s or orders or directions & Judge’s orders. Registrar’s orders.
None for the Applicants. None for the Respondents.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A. A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 3RD MARCH 2014
P.C.:
. None appears for the parties. Perused the
averments made in the Application. In view of the averments made in the Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today.
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court