In a civil application arising from a letters patent appeal at the Bombay High Court, the bench allowed the application's prayers (a) and (b) based on the averments made in the petition.
Prayer clauses (a) and (b) of the application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
cal-37.14
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2014 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.169 OF 2013
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Shri M.S. Topkar for the Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A. A. SAYED, JJ DATE : 3RD MARCH 2014
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant. In view of the averments made in the Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).
(A.A. SAYED, J) (A.S.OKA, J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application prayers should be allowed based on the averments.
Applicant
A.S. OKA
A. A. SAYED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court