Application regarding pending family court appeals was rejected due to priority given to senior citizen appeals from 2007 and 2008.
Application for priority hearing is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cam-140.14
1
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2014
IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.163 OF 2010
Ghanshyam Mohanlal Parmar … Applicant In the matter between Ghanshyam Mohanlal Parmar … Petitioner Vs. Pushpa Ghanshyam Parmar ... Respondent
Mr. Jaydev Trivedi, for the Applicant.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.A. SAYED, JJ.
DATE : 23rd APRIL, 2014
P.C.
. On the final hearing board of this Court, there are Family
Court Appeals from the years 2007 onwards. We have perused the nature of the impugned decree. There are Appeals of the Senior Citizens of the year 2007 and 2008 pending on this Court. Therefore, priority
cannot be given to the Appeal of the year 2010 as of today. Application is rejected.
1 of 1
Ghanshyam Mohanlal Parmar
Pushpa Ghanshyam Parmar
A.S. Oka
A.A. Sayed
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
