This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cai-97.14
1
ash
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.97 OF 2014 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.29 OF 2008
Office Notes, Office memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
Court’s or Judge’s orders.
Shri Uday P. Warunjikar for the Applicant. Shri Ajit J. Kenjale for the Respondent No.4.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.S.CHANDURKAR,JJ DATED : 4TH AUGUST 2014
P.C.:
. Heard learned counsel appearing for the
Applicant and the learned counsel appearing for the fourth Respondent. As of today, it appears that the dispute is not amicably resolved. The Application for amendment of the Petition is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the fourth Respondent. There is a reply filed by the fourth Respondent. The opposition seems to be on merits. The contentions which are sought to be raised by way of amendment will have to be permitted to be raised by keeping the
cai-97.14
2
ash
contentions of the parties open. Accordingly, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within a period of three weeks from today.
Unknown Applicant
Respondent No. 4
A.S. Oka
A.S. Chandurkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court