This order dismissed four civil applications for stay of a common judgment passed by the Revenue Divisional Officer regarding land acquisition references, holding that the applications failed after their respective stay applications facing interim application for condonation of delay were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1 ca5181.13
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5181 OF 2013
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.4586 OF 2013
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5183 OF 2013
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.4589 OF 2013
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5185 OF 2013
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.4594 OF 2013
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5187 OF 2013
IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO.4597 OF 2013
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
VERSUS
TRIMBAK VITHOBA ADHAV AND OTHERS
...
A.G.P. for Applicant : Shri.V.P.Kadam
...
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.
Dated: August 26, 2014
...
PER COURT :-
1.Heard Shri.V.P.Kadam, learned A.G.P. for
the applicants.
2.These are the applications for stay to
common judgment dated 20.07.2010 passed by Civil
VSM/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
2 ca5181.13
Judge (S.D.), Shrigonda in land acquisition
references.
3.In view of dismissal of civil applications
for condonation of delay, nothing survive in these
applications and the same stand rejected.
...
ca5181.13
VSM/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether stay applications survive after dismissal of condonation of delay applications
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
TRIMBAK VITHOBA ADHAV AND OTHERS
K. K. TATED
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court