This order allowed Civil Application No. 465/2012 seeking condonation of delay in filing cross-objections in Cross-Objections No. 845/2012. The court held that the application would be heard along with the appeal.
Civil Application No. 465/2012 allowed; delay condoned; matter to be heard with appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CA 465/12 in X-OBJ (St) 845/12
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.465/2012 IN
CROSS-OBJECTIONS (St) NO.845/2012
Saluram Bala Mithe & others V/s The CIDCO & others.
_______________________________________________________
Office Notes, Office |
Memoranda of Coram, | Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's |
orders or directions|
and Registrar's orders |
Shri D.R. Jaybhar, Advocate for applicant.
A.S. Bajaj, Advocate for respondent no.1.
Shri D.V. Tele, AGP for respondent no.2.
Shri N.S. Choudhary, Standing Counsel for respondent
no.3.
CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & A.M. BADAR, JJ.
Date: 27.06.2014
1]This is an application for
condonation of delay in filing
cross-objections.
2]Even otherwise, the cross-
objections will have to be heard
along with the appeal.
3]Considering these aspects,
CA 465/12 in X-OBJ (St) 845/12
2
civil application is allowed and
disposed of. Delay is condoned.
(S.V. Gangapurwala, J.)
(A.M. Badar, J.)
Dt/- 27.06.2014
ndk/c2761443
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay for filing cross-objections should be allowed.
Saluram Bala Mithe & others
The CIDCO & others
S.V. Gangapurwala
A.M. Badar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court