The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad, in Civil Application No. 21 of 2014, observed that since the underlying Appeal No. 1 of 2014 has been disposed of, nothing survives for consideration. Consequently, the Civil Application was disposed of with no substantive reasoning or order provided on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca21.14
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2014
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1 OF 2014
Santosh s/o Subhash Bhosale
...APPLICANT
VERSUS
1) Surekha w/o Shrikrishna Bhosale,
2) Abdul Khadar s/o Rahemansab Shaikh,
...RESPONDENTS
...
Shri.N.J. Patil Advocate for Appellant.
Shri.A.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.1.
...
CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.
DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2014
ORDER :
1.In view of disposal of the Appeal from
Order itself, nothing survives for consideration
in this Civil Application. The Civil Application
is disposed of.
[A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.]
asb/JAN14
Santosh s/o Subhash Bhosale
Surekha w/o Shrikrishna Bhosale
Abdul Khadar s/o Rahemansab Shaikh
A.I.S. CHEEMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court