Allowed

Santosh Subhash Bhosale v. Surekha Shrikrishna Bhosale and Another

Bombay HC24 Jan 2014AO/1/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court upheld an impugned order dated 13.06.2013 maintaining the status quo until the disposal of a regular civil appeal. The High Court directed the First Appellate Court to dispose of the suit within three months.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order of 13.06.2013 confirmed; First Appellate Court directed to dispose of Regular Civil Suit within THREE months.

Santosh Subhash Bhosale Vs Surekha Shrikrishna… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2014)

¶1

ao1.14

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.1 OF 2014

¶6

Santosh s/o Subhash Bhosale,
Age-34 years, Occu:Agri.,
R/o-Matola, Tq-Ausa, Dist-Latur.

¶7

...APPELLANT

¶8

 VERSUS

¶9

1) Surekha w/o Shrikrishna Bhosale, Age-34 years, Occu:Agri.,

¶10

R/o-matola, Tq-Ausa, Dist-Latur,

¶11

Through her General Power of Attorney Shrikrishna s/o Dhondiram Bhosale, Age-48 years, Occu:Agri.,

¶12

R/o-Matola, Tq-Ausa, Dist-Latur,

¶13

2) Abdul Khadar s/o Rahemansab Shaikh, Age-79 years, Occu:Agri.,

¶14

R/o-Matola, Tq-Ausa, Dist-Latur.

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

 Shri.N.J. Patil Advocate for Appellant.
 Shri.A.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent No.1.
 ...

¶17

CORAM: A.I.S. CHEEMA, J.

¶18

 DATE : 24TH JANUARY, 2014

¶19

ao1.14

¶20

¶21

ORDER :

¶22

1.Heard learned counsel for Appellant and
Respondent No.1. Both the learned counsel submit
that maintaining the impugned order dated 13th
June 2013, during the pendency of Regular Civil
Appeal No.238 of 2012, present Appeal from Order
can be disposed of by expediting the hearing of
the Regular Civil Appeal No.238 of 2012, pending
before the First Appellate Court. The counsel for
both sides submit that even the paper-book is
ready in the First Appellate Court.

¶23

2.Looking to the submissions made, the

¶24

impugned order dated 13th June, 2013 passed in
Regular Civil Appeal No.238 of 2012 is confirmed

¶25

and is to be maintained till decision of the
Regular Civil Appeal No.238 of 2012. This Appeal
is disposed of with directions to the First
Appellate Court to expedite hearing of Regular
Civil Suit No.238 of 2012. The First Appellate

¶26

ao1.14

¶27

¶28

Court is directed to dispose the said Appeal
within THREE MONTHS from the date of this order.

¶29

3.With the above directions, this Appeal
from Order is disposed of.

¶30

 [A.I.S. CHEEMA,J.]

¶31

asb/JAN14

Santosh Subhash Bhosale v. Surekha Shrikrishna Bhosale and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Subhash Bhosale v. Surekha Shrikrishna Bhosale and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bahujan Samaj Prabodhan Shikshan Sanstha, Kotul Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Shivprakash Ramkishan Malpani and Ors. Vs Kunal Ashokrao Aher and Others

Sachin Pandurang Marathe Vs Ajitkumar Vasantrao Patil

Sitaram Bhaurao Thorat and Another Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Harisundar Mahila Bahuuddeshiya Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Udgir Vs Ujwal Uke and Others

Santosh Subhash Bhosale Vs Surekha Shrikrishna Bhosale and Another