The High Court of Bombay at Goa dismissed the civil application as infructuous on the disposal of the underlying appeal (Order No. 29 of 2013). No substantive legal proposition is stated as the decision is procedural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 110 OF 2013
IN
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 29 OF 2013
MS. ALKA TORASKAR @ ASHA PARSEKAR., ... Applicant
Versus SHRI ASHOK TORASKAR AND 3 ORS.,
... Respondents
Ms. A. Dessai, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. D. Lotlikar, Senior Advocate with Mr. P. S. Lotlikar, Advocate for respondent no.4. None present for respondents no. 1 to 3.
Coram:U. V. BAKRE, J.
Date:21st February, 2014
P.C.
In view of disposal of the Appeal from Order No.29/2013, this application has become infructuous and is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
SMA
MS. ALKA TORASKAR @ ASHA PARSEKAR.
SHRI ASHOK TORASKAR AND 3 ORS.
U. V. BAKRE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
