right, title and/or interest in the suit property, without consent and agreement of the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that there was no petition or inventory for separation of the property of the plaintiff and defendant no.1 and that they had purchased a part of the property bearing Survey No. 4/5 and 6 known as “Bazaar Peth” situated at Thivim, Bardez, Goa admeasuring 1190 square metres by Sale Deed dated 26/12/1981. The said property is presently surveyed under Survey No. 4/5-A and 4/6-A respectively admeasuring 450 square metres and 740 square metres. The plaintiff contended that on 09/12/2012, she noticed some laterite stones dumped in the suit property and on enquiry, learnt that Mr. Bhaskar, a Construction Contractor had dumped the same and found that vide Sale Deed dated 19/05/2008, the defendant no.1 falsely claiming to be absolute owner of the suit property, sold it to defendant no. 2 by Sale Deed dated 26/05/2008, who in turn, sold the same to defendant no. 3 by Sale Deed dated 26/05/2008 and who further sold the same to defendant no. 4 by Sale Deed dated 06/01/2011. Apprehending that the defendants may start construction in or interfere with or encroach upon the suit property or create further third party rights, the plaintiff filed the suit and application for temporary injunction.
