Samit Dilip Naik v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Applicant voluntarily withdrew bail application while investigation was pending and court dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
spb/
907ba743-14.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 743 OF 2014
Samit Dilip Naik … Applicant.
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent.
Mr. Yoshodhan Gavankar for the Applicant. Mrs. V. S. Mhaispurkar, APP for the State. Mr. S.D. Nikam, PSI, Kudal Police Station, Sindhudurg, is present.
CORAM : A. M. THIPSAY, J. DATE : 12 JUNE, 2014
P.C. :
During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the Applicant submits that considering that the matter is at investigation stage, he would not press the bail application. He submits that the Applicant would file another application before the Magistrate after the investigation would be over.
Application is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such.
1/1
Borey
Samit Dilip Naik
The State of Maharashtra
A. M. THIPSAY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court