Hemal Ravindra Kapadia v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Mhi 1
BA-1660-14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAILAPPLICATION NO. 1660 OF 2014
Mr. Hemal Ravindra Kapadia ... Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra ... Respondents
Mr. Vikas Laxman Kolekar,Advocate for the applicant Mr.A.S.Shitole, APP, for the respondent-State.
CORAM: SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV,J. DATE : 24th November, 2014.
P.C .
Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
application seeking bail to the Metropolitan Magistrate through Jail. The Advocate representing him previously had obtained his signature when the applicant was brought for remand and hence he was represented by the same Advocate. The applicant has been enlarged on bail. The learnd Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate on 12.11.2014 has directed the applicant to be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/-. He was released on
cash security for a limited period. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate has
Mhi 2 BA-1660-14.sxw observed that the charge-sheet is filed. The co-accused have been granted anticipatory bail and hence he has enlarged the applicant on bail. The learned counsel submits that hence the prayer in the present applicant has become infructuous. The applicant is present before the Court in person. The application is withdrawn.
The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)
Hemal Ravindra Kapadia
State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court