Criminal applicant prosecuted under multiple charges approached the high court for bail. A counsel for the state filed a charge sheet. The high court viewed the charge sheet as grounds for dismissal and disposed of the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6.BA1651_2014.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1651 OF 2014
Vishwanath Suhas Joshi … Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Umesh R. Mankapure, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. A.A. Mane, APP for the State.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 25th August, 2014.
P.C.
This bail Application is filed, as the applicant/accused is prosecuted
for the offence punishable under sections 379, 285, 427, 410 r/w. 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also under sections 3, 6(a), 7 of the Essential Commodities Act and under section 15 of Petroleum Act and under sections 3, 4 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by the applicant should be disposed of or allowed.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Vishwanath Suhas Joshi
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhatkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
