In bail application under sections 307 and 498A IPC, court refused bail due to gravity of allegations including attempts to kill and harm, supported by witness statements.
Bail application dismissed and applicant refused bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
41.BA1219_2014.doc
Vidya Amin
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1219 OF 2014
Yuvraj Shivaji Patil … Applicant vs. The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Raju Yamgar a/w. Mr. Amol Patil i/b. Mr. Sachin K. Hande, Advocate for the applicant.
Mrs. A.A.Mane, APP for the State.
CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 25th August, 2014.
P.C.
This Application is moved for bail by the applicant/accused, who is
prosecuted for the offences punishable under sections 307, 498A of the Indian Penal Code in C.R. No. 65 of 2014 registered with Vadgaon Police Station. The incident of assault has taken place on 7th April, 2014 in the evening on the road near toll naka at Karad.
1 of 2
41.BA1219_2014.doc
However, hearing her screaming, the passerby gathered and they rescued her. The people gathered there contacted her parents and they also manhandled the applicant/accused.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused of offences under sections 307 and 498A IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Yuvraj Shivaji Patil
The State of Maharashtra
Mridula Bhatakhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
