Mahendra Jogilal Chaurasia v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail applications rejected for two applicants charged with cheating a bank through bogus loan proposals. The Court held that given the conspiracy, public money loss, and pattern of habitual offenses, bail is not deserved.
What did the court decide?
Applications for bail under Section 439 CrPC rejected and disposed of.
What the court decided
1 7.ba1253.1612.14.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1253 OF 2014
Mahendra Jogilal Chaurasia.
... Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.
... Respondent.
WITH
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1612 OF 2014
Suresh Tejulal Chaurasiya. ... Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. ... Respondent.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to appellants charged with conspiracy and cheating against a bank.
Whether the fact that offences are triable by a Magistrate is sufficient to grant bail in such serious financial fraud cases.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mahendra Jogilal Chaurasia
- applicant
Suresh Tejulal Chaurasiya
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court