An application was withdrawn by the applicant with liberty. The High Court granted liberty to withdraw and dismissed the application accordingly.
Liberty to withdraw granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 62.359.14 appp
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 556 OF 2013
Karen Raghunathan
.....Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra
....Respondent
Mr. Shweta Kadam h/f N. B. Sawant for Applicant Mr. Arfan Sait APP for the State.
CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J. DATED : NOVEMBER 14, 2014
PC :
(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)
ism
Karen Raghunathan
The State of Maharashtra
Sadhana S. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
