Two bail applications were withdrawn by the applicants as they were acquitted in the trial. The court disposed of both applications as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25_ba_2256_2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE – CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2256 OF 2014
Prakash @ Balu Sadanand Salvi .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Shekhar Ingawale, for the Applicant Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the RespondentState
with
BAIL APPLICATION NO.1218 OF 2014
Shri Haresh Ratilal Chabhaiyya .... Applicant Vs. The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent
Mr. Lokesh D. Zade, for the Applicant Mrs. G.P. Mulekar, APP for the RespondentState.
CORAM: P.D. KODE, J.
DATED: NOVEMBER 24, 2014
P.C:
Learned Counsel for the Applicants in each of the
application states that they have instructions to withdraw the applications as the trial is over and the Applicants are acquitted.
In view of the statement made, both the applications stand
disposed of as infructuous.
(P.D. KODE, J.)
Megha 1 of 1
Prakash @ Balu Sadanand Salvi
The State of Maharashtra
P.D. KODE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
