Dhananjay Sahebrao Katka and Ors. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
In an anticipatory bail application, the High Court, Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction, Bombay, confirmed the *ad-interim* pre-arrest bail granted previously. The court held that the improbability of the late allegations and the minor nature of weapons used negated the necessity for custodial interrogation.
What did the court decide?
Ad-interim pre-arrest bail granted by the predecessor judge is confirmed on earlier terms and conditions.
What the court decided
ABA 1334-14.odt
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1334 OF 2014
(For Anticipatory Bail)
- Dhananjay Sahebrao Katkar .Applicants
- Devidas Sahebrao Katkar
- Sahebrao Bhagwan Katkar
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent
Mr.S.B.Thorat, Advocate, for the Applicants Mr.Y.M.Nakhwa, APP, for the Respondent - State
DATE : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2014
P.C.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the ad-interim pre-arrest bail granted by the predecessor judge should be confirmed given the injury severity and weapon recovery claims.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dhananjay Sahebrao Katkar
- applicant
Devidas Sahebrao Katkar
- applicant
Sahebrao Bhagwan Katkar
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court